Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

The Hunger Games VS Battle Royale

 Battle Royale

















Author(s)               Koushun Takami

Translator              Yuji Oniki

Country                 Japan

Language                Japanese

Genre(s)                Dystopian

                        Thriller

                        Horror

                        Alternative history

Publisher               Ohta Shuppan

Publication date        Film was released on 2000


The Hunger Games
















Author(s)               Koushun Takami

Cover artist            Tim O'Brien

Country                 United States

Language                English

Genre(s)                Dystopian

                        Advaenture

                        Science fiction [1]

                        Action

Publisher               Scholastic Press

Publication date    Film was released on 2012


Story Line / Plot

The Hunger Games, at it's core, is a science fiction adventure story with a dash of political drama.  The dystopian setting, futuristic vehicles and genetically modified whatnots add to this formula.  It functions with a realistic voice from the narrator who is contained within a world that she doesn't agree with and has many disputes with.  It's supposed to be a fun and exciting story to experience, something that is relatable because of the bond that we can form with the characters.  In regards to the violent centerpiece of the story, the actual Hunger Games, within the context of the story, it is viewed purely as entertainment.  Which speaks volumes about how we should view the story itself.


Battle Royale is quite different.  The idea that the country has descended into madness is only a setup for what the story holds.  There is no real subtext within the killing or the love story of the two leads that relates back to the idea of the country in turmoil or the purpose of the BR act (punishing the children).  It also handles its violence with a very tongue-in-cheek quality at times.  Examining the amount of blood that shoots out of a freshly made wound in Battle Royale is proof enough what kind of style it's taking.


The Setting

The general set up for the two stories is similar.  A dystopian future where in a group of children are required to fight to the death until there is a victor.  But is it really that simple?  In Battle Royale, the country is in shambles for no particular reason; it can probably be linked to an economic crisis with so much of the population out of work as the prologue suggests.  As a result of the downfall of Japan, the students have protested school and the adults being in fear of the teenagers pass the “Battle Royale” act.  The act chooses one classroom of teenagers in the country and places them in a location to fight to the death in three days.


The Hunger Games, on the other hand, is set up with a country divided into different districts, all spread around the country of "Panem" - what remains of the United States and Canada.  There was, at one point, an uprising against the totalitarian government known as “The Capitol” in which one of the districts was completely obliterated.  As a result, every year two “tributes” are chosen from each district, a male and a female, to fight to the death as a way to acknowledge that The Capitol is still in control.

 

Now, it should be noted that “District 12,” where the main character Katniss Everdeen lives, is indeed a “poor” district, but this not a reflection of the country of Panem as a whole.  So, as far as the setting is concerned, Battle Royale has a country falling into a chaotic downward spiral, The Hunger Games has a country that functions as a country does today with richer and poorer sections and a fully functioning class system.

 

The set-up for the games are also quite different.  Part of the aesthetic of Battle Royale is that the group of children selected are in the same classroom and thus all know each other.  This reflects the very sadistic nature taken on by the Battle Royale act itself.  The children are also selected in an effort to teach the remaining population of children “behave or this could happen to you”.

 

When the children from The Hunger Games are selected, the only ones that know each other are the ones from the same districts.  Presumably, they might not know each other either considering their ages could be range from 12 to 18.  This works toward the favor of the games as it should make it easier for them to kill their fellow tributes if they don't know them.  But in Battle Royale, where the very fact that they know each other and by their very nature should refuse to kill them is again part of the very sadistic nature of the story.


The Characters

The behavior of characters in a story is a very important. It takes their decisions and actions that form what the story becomes and why you remember a character from the story anyway. This is entirely true for both of these stories.

 

The Hunger Games, Katniss is a relatable young woman with pathos and and fervor behind her. She serves as our gateway into the story, and does so well.  As a character, she is familiar with The Hunger Games and though she never anticipates actually playing in them, strategy and forethought are always at the back of her mind. The supporting cast in the story are also important regarding what's happening here.  Not all of them are in cahoots with The Capitol's devious ways, some of them are there for Katniss.  They help them get into a mindset that is necessary in their achievement throughout the story.

 

If you took all of the characters from Battle Royale and lined them up and then threw a rock at one of them with your eyes closed chances are the one you hit would be a complete and utter psycho.  Except for the two main characters in the story, almost every single other person is bat-shit insane.  There is very little moderation in this story, everything is to one extreme or the other.  While the two leads do act sensibly, and they do stand out for it, the moments when they break character and lose it for a second are far more memorable than when they're sitting in a ditch or a shack crying about how they love each other.

 

To me this is the defining difference between these two stories. Sure, there are some characters in The Hunger Games that are crazy, but literally almost every character in Battle Royale is totally off their rocker.  There is little to no similarity in terms of character dynamics and behavior between these two.


No comments:

Post a Comment